4 files changed, 262 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/dev/pages/issues/.name b/docs/dev/pages/issues/.name
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b207fb4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/dev/pages/issues/.name
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+❓ Issues
diff --git a/docs/dev/pages/issues/remove-r-print-macro.md b/docs/dev/pages/issues/remove-r-print-macro.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..96f99ef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/dev/pages/issues/remove-r-print-macro.md
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+<h1 align="center">Remove r_print! and r_println! Macros</h1>
+
+`r_print!` and `r_println!` are important macros in Mingling for use inside `#[help]` and `#[renderer]` functions, but their implementation is not clean: they implicitly introduce a `__renderer_inner_result` field. While this might look elegant at the API level, it is **incorrect** and even **objectionable**.
+
+## Why **Objectionable**?
+
+Because you can't define declarative macros with `macro_rules` that wrap them.
+
+This is because `r_println!` depends on the implicit variable `__renderer_inner_result` injected by the `#[renderer]` proc macro into the function body. However, when a `macro_rules` declarative macro expands, **its internal code is placed in the caller's context**, which does not contain `__renderer_inner_result` — that variable only exists within the direct scope of the function body processed by `#[renderer]`.
+
+Let's look at some code to see why:
+
+```rust
+// Suppose you want to write a wrapper macro:
+macro_rules! my_println {
+    ($($arg:tt)*) => {
+        // When expanded here, the context is the call site of my_println!,
+        // not the location where the renderer function's injected variables live.
+        // So __renderer_inner_result is NOT visible here!
+        r_println!("Custom: {}", format!($($arg)*));
+    };
+}
+ 
+#[renderer]
+fn render_something(_p: ResultSomething) {
+    // Although this function body has __renderer_inner_result injected,
+    // the code from my_println! does NOT expand "inside this function body" —
+    // macro_rules expansion is essentially text replacement. The replaced code
+    // lives at the line where my_println! is called, and any variables referenced
+    // inside that macro must resolve to identifiers accessible at the call site.
+    // __renderer_inner_result is not a public, path-accessible variable;
+    // it's a hygienic local variable generated by the `#[renderer]` macro,
+    // and external macros cannot directly access it by name.
+    my_println!("{}", box_val); // Compile error: cannot find __renderer_inner_result
+}
+```
+ 
+## Deeper Issues
+
+I have to admit, this is an early design flaw. After re-examining the code, I found the problem goes beyond "can't be wrapped".
+
+This isn't just a "can't wrap" issue — it reflects that `r_println!`'s design fundamentally violates Rust's macro hygiene principles:
+
+- **Implicit dependency**: Users of the macro must know that a variable named `__renderer_inner_result` exists — but this variable is neither part of the public API nor explicitly documented anywhere.
+- **Scope leakage**: Variables injected by a proc macro should be confined to the scope processed by that macro. But `r_println!` attempts to make that variable accessible across macro calls, which effectively breaks Rust's identifier hygiene.
+- **Non-composable**: Any attempt to wrap `r_println!` will fail, because declarative macros cannot "pass through" access to implicit variables. Even using a proc macro to wrap it would encounter similar hygiene issues.
+
+## Desired New Syntax
+
+I've designed two alternative approaches and will choose based on actual needs.
+
+### Option 1: Explicit Return
+
+```rust
+#[renderer]
+fn render_something(prev: ResultSomething) -> RenderResult {
+    let mut result = RenderResult::new();
+    result.println(prev.to_string());
+    // or
+    write!(result, "{}", prev.to_string());
+ 
+    result // return here
+}
+```
+ 
+Clear boundaries — the entire rendering process is confined within the function body decorated by `#[help]` or `#[renderer]`, without introducing extra out-of-scope dependencies. The trade-off is slightly more boilerplate compared to the original approach.
+
+### Option 2: Resource Injection
+
+```rust
+#[renderer]
+fn render_something(prev: ResultSomething, result: &mut ResRenderResult) {
+    result.println(prev.to_string());
+    // or
+    write!(result, "{}", prev.to_string());
+ 
+    result // return here
+}
+```
+ 
+More flexible, but blurs the boundary between logic functions like `#[chain]` and rendering functions like `#[help]`.
+
+### Preferred Direction
+
+I lean toward **Option 1 (Explicit Return)**. There's no need to turn `RenderResult` into `ResRenderResult` as a global resource.
+
+As for rendering in logic functions like `#[chain]`, that should be handled by a separate system — not discussed here.
+
+## 🕘 Progress
+
+- [ ] In Progress
+  - [ ] Remove `r_println!` and `r_print!` macros
+  - [ ] Modify `#[renderer]` and `#[help]` macros, remove implicit injection
+  - [ ] Provide **no-return-value mode** and **RenderResult return value mode** for `#[renderer]` and `#[help]` macros
+  - [ ] Add new simplified syntax
+  - [ ] Update documentation and test cases, ensure **all pass**
+- [ ] Complete
diff --git a/docs/dev/pages/issues/the-mod-pathfinder.md b/docs/dev/pages/issues/the-mod-pathfinder.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..676251d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/dev/pages/issues/the-mod-pathfinder.md
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+<h1 align="center">The Mod Pathfinder</h1>
+<p align="center">
+    A build-time analyzer that computes full module paths for Mingling types, resolving path ambiguity in macros.
+</p>
+
+## Background
+
+Currently, `gen_program!` requires all involved types to be `use`d within their module. Mingling lacks a complete module path analyzer — waiting for `proc-macro-span` to stabilize is clearly not practical, so a solution for obtaining module paths is needed.
+
+## Solution
+
+We plan to create an analyzer called `mingling-mod-pathf`, enabled via Mingling's `"pathf"` feature, to compute the full paths of all defined Mingling types.
+
+### Behavior When Enabled
+
+**`mingling_core`**: If the `builds` feature is enabled, introduces the `mingling::build::analyze_and_build_type_mapping()` method (analysis completed at Build-Time)
+
+**`mingling_macros`**: Modifies the behavior of the `gen_program!()` macro — automatically loads the mapping table from the analysis file generated by `mingling::build::analyze_and_build_type_mapping()`, and directly uses the full `mod::path` instead of `TypeName` (injected at Compile-Time)
+
+## Challenges
+
+`mingling-mod-pathf` needs to understand **all** Mingling syntax features.
+Fortunately, Mingling's type creation is almost always explicit:
+
+```rust
+mod sub {
+    mingling::macros::pack!(ResultMyName = String); // directly creates ..::sub::ResultMyName
+}
+```
+ 
+There are a few exceptions, such as the implicit Dispatcher provided by `extra_macros`, but these can be inferred from the node name:
+
+```rust
+dispatcher!("remote.add"); // although the type is unknown, we can infer CMDRemoteAdd and EntryRemoteAdd
+```
+ 
+And also `#[program_setup]`:
+
+```rust
+#[program_setup] // can infer CustomSetup from the function name `custom_setup`
+fn custom_setup(program: &mut Program<ThisProgram>) {
+    program.with_dispatchers((CMD1, CMD2, CMD3, CMD4, CMD5));
+}
+```
+ 
+## Pathf Output Format
+
+Uses TOML key-value pairs, formatted as follows:
+
+```toml
+ResultRemoteAdd = "crate::mymod::ResultRemoteAdd"
+```
+ 
+Recommended storage location is under the target directory:
+
+```
+/target/{target}/{crate-name}/type-mapping.toml
+```
+ 
+## Other Issues
+
+This solution is limited to Mingling's own syntax system. If types like `dispatcher!`, `pack!` are indirectly expanded through macros, the analyzer will not be able to discover them.
+
+However, this approach solves the current main pain points, so this issue can be set aside for now and addressed later.
diff --git a/docs/dev/pages/issues/the-shit-time.md b/docs/dev/pages/issues/the-shit-time.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9d6c429
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/dev/pages/issues/the-shit-time.md
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+<h1 align="center">Some Situations Where You'd Be Like "Shit!"</h1>
+<p align="center">
+    This document collects the discomforts currently experienced while using Mingling.
+</p>
+
+This document collects the discomforts currently experienced while using Mingling.
+
+Of course, you can also contribute to this document.
+
+---
+
+## Why is there no fallback completion logic?
+
+(completion) (fallback)
+
+Currently, Mingling's Completion only supports providing completion logic for specific subcommands, with no way to provide global completion.
+
+For example:
+
+```
+mycmd <tab>
+completion:
+--help    -h  --- Display helps
+--version -V  --- Display versions
+```
+ 
+Currently, there is no workaround.
+
+Ideal solution:
+
+```rust
+#[completion(EntryGlobal)]
+fn complete(ctx: &ShellContext) -> Suggest {
+    // ...
+}
+```
+ 
+---
+
+## Why can't I register descriptions for commands?
+
+(completion) (dispatcher)
+
+Currently, Mingling's Completion cannot register a description for each subcommand.
+
+For example:
+
+```
+mycmd <tab>
+completion:
+add rm list <--- You cannot register descriptions for commands
+```
+ 
+Expected behavior:
+
+```
+mycmd <tab>
+completion:
+add  --- Add something
+rm   --- Remove something
+list --- List something
+```
+ 
+Ideal solution:
+
+```rust
+// It should be able to freely integrate with crates that provide i18n functionality,
+// so the following approach cannot be used as a data source for descriptions.
+dispatcher! {
+    /// Add Something <--- How to i18n?
+    "add", CMDAdd => EntryAdd
+}
+ 
+// Ideally, it should satisfy the following two conditions:
+// 1. No need to use `with_dispatcher`, because `with_dispatcher` is disabled in `dispatch_tree` mode
+// 2. Must be able to accept String or &str at runtime
+ 
+// Current idea
+#[inline(always)]
+#[dispatcher_desc(EntryAdd)]
+fn desc_add() -> String {
+    // If using rust_i18n
+    t!("cmd.add.desc")
+}
+ 
+// Or
+ 
+#[completion(CMDAdd)]
+fn desc_add(_ctx: &ShellContext) -> Suggest {
+    // If using rust_i18n
+    suggest{
+        t!("cmd.add.desc")
+    }
+}
+ 
+// Collected and generated by `gen_program!()`
+// Generate something like get_dispatcher_desc(id: &ThisProgram) -> String
+// Match the corresponding function using enum values inside ThisProgram
+gen_program!()
+```