1 files changed, 409 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/test.rs b/src/test.rs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..15a7002
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,409 @@
+use crate::{bill::Bills, calc::calculate_from};
+
+#[test]
+fn test_no_zero_amount_transactions() {
+    let mut bills = Bills::default();
+
+    // Create some bills where some transaction amounts might be 0
+    // A pays 30, split among A, B, C (10 each)
+    bills.add_bill("A", "Lunch", 30., vec!["A", "B", "C"]);
+    // B pays 30, split among A, B (15 each)
+    bills.add_bill("B", "Coffee", 30., vec!["A", "B"]);
+
+    let result = calculate_from(bills);
+    assert!(result.is_ok(), "calculate should be success");
+    let result = result.unwrap();
+
+    // Check if there are any transactions with amount 0 in the complete record (items)
+    let all_items = result.get_all_bills();
+    for (payer, bills_list) in all_items {
+        for bill in bills_list {
+            assert_ne!(
+                bill.bill, 0.0,
+                "There should be no transactions with amount 0 in the complete record: {} to {} amount is 0",
+                payer, bill.payee
+            );
+        }
+    }
+
+    // Check if there are any transactions with amount 0 in the simplified result (final_result)
+    let final_result = result.get_final_result();
+    for ((payer, payee), amount) in final_result {
+        assert_ne!(
+            *amount, 0.0,
+            "There should be no transactions with amount 0 in the simplified result: {} to {} amount is 0",
+            payer, payee
+        );
+    }
+
+    // Verify transaction count
+    // Should have: C->A (10), A->B (5) after netting
+    assert_eq!(
+        final_result.len(),
+        2,
+        "There should be 2 non-zero transactions"
+    );
+    assert!(
+        final_result.contains_key(&("C".into(), "A".into())),
+        "Should contain transaction C->A"
+    );
+    assert!(
+        final_result.contains_key(&("A".into(), "B".into())),
+        "Should contain transaction A->B"
+    );
+
+    // Verify specific amounts
+    let c_to_a = final_result.get(&("C".into(), "A".into())).unwrap();
+    assert_eq!(*c_to_a, 10.0, "C should pay A 10");
+
+    let a_to_b = final_result.get(&("A".into(), "B".into())).unwrap();
+    assert_eq!(*a_to_b, 5.0, "A should pay B 5");
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_zero_amount_edge_cases() {
+    let mut bills = Bills::default();
+
+    // Test perfectly balanced case: A and B prepay the same amount for each other
+    // A prepays 20 for A, B (10 each)
+    bills.add_bill("A", "Dinner", 20., vec!["A", "B"]);
+    // B prepays 20 for A, B (10 each)
+    bills.add_bill("B", "Movie", 20., vec!["A", "B"]);
+
+    let result = calculate_from(bills);
+    assert!(result.is_ok(), "calculate should be success");
+    let result = result.unwrap();
+
+    // Check complete record
+    let all_items = result.get_all_bills();
+    for (payer, bills_list) in all_items {
+        for bill in bills_list {
+            assert_ne!(
+                bill.bill, 0.0,
+                "There should be no transactions with amount 0 in the complete record: {} to {} amount is 0",
+                payer, bill.payee
+            );
+        }
+    }
+
+    // Check simplified result - should be empty because all transactions cancel out
+    let final_result = result.get_final_result();
+    assert_eq!(
+        final_result.len(),
+        0,
+        "The simplified result should be empty because all transaction amounts are 0"
+    );
+
+    // Verify no transactions are included
+    assert!(
+        !final_result.contains_key(&("A".into(), "B".into())),
+        "Should not contain A->B zero amount transaction"
+    );
+    assert!(
+        !final_result.contains_key(&("B".into(), "A".into())),
+        "Should not contain B->A zero amount transaction"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_items_count() {
+    let mut bills = Bills::default();
+
+    // Add 3 bill items
+    let id1 = bills.add_bill("A", "Lunch", 30., vec!["A", "B"]);
+    let id2 = bills.add_bill("B", "Coffee", 20., vec!["B", "C"]);
+    let id3 = bills.add_bill("C", "Snack", 15., vec!["A", "C"]);
+
+    // Verify items count
+    assert_eq!(bills.get_all_items().len(), 3, "Should have 3 items");
+
+    // Verify each ID exists
+    assert!(bills.contains_item(&id1), "Item 1 should exist");
+    assert!(bills.contains_item(&id2), "Item 2 should exist");
+    assert!(bills.contains_item(&id3), "Item 3 should exist");
+
+    // Verify count after deleting one item
+    let removed = bills.delete_item(&id2);
+    assert!(removed.is_some(), "Should remove item 2");
+    assert_eq!(
+        bills.get_all_items().len(),
+        2,
+        "Should have 2 items after removal"
+    );
+
+    // Verify deleted item no longer exists
+    assert!(
+        !bills.contains_item(&id2),
+        "Item 2 should not exist after removal"
+    );
+
+    // Verify count after clearing
+    bills.clear_items();
+    assert_eq!(
+        bills.get_all_items().len(),
+        0,
+        "Should have 0 items after clear"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_result() {
+    let mut bills = Bills::default();
+
+    // Define data
+    bills.add_bill("A", "BBQ", 90., vec!["A", "B", "C"]);
+    bills.add_bill("B", "Water", 21., vec!["A", "B", "C"]);
+
+    // Calculate
+    let result = calculate_from(bills);
+
+    // Check result
+    assert!(result.is_ok(), "calculate should be success");
+
+    let result = result.unwrap();
+
+    // Verify split results
+    let c_to_a = result
+        .get_final_result_item("C".into(), "A".into())
+        .expect("Item C to A should be exist");
+    assert_eq!(c_to_a, 30.0, "C should pay A 30 for BBQ");
+
+    let c_to_b = result
+        .get_final_result_item("C".into(), "B".into())
+        .expect("Item C to B should be exist");
+    assert_eq!(c_to_b, 7.0, "C should pay B 7 for Water");
+
+    let b_to_a = result
+        .get_final_result_item("B".into(), "A".into())
+        .expect("Item B to A should be exist");
+    assert_eq!(b_to_a, 23.0, "B should pay A 23 (30 - 7)");
+
+    // Verify count
+    let final_result = result.get_final_result();
+    assert_eq!(final_result.len(), 3, "Should have exactly 3 transactions");
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_complex_bills() {
+    let mut bills = Bills::default();
+
+    // A prepays 50 for B and C, B and C should each pay A 25
+    bills.add_bill("A", "Dinner", 50., vec!["B", "C"]);
+
+    let result = calculate_from(bills);
+    assert!(result.is_ok(), "calculate should be success");
+    let result = result.unwrap();
+
+    let b_to_a = result
+        .get_final_result_item("B".into(), "A".into())
+        .expect("Item B to A should be exist");
+    assert_eq!(b_to_a, 25.0, "B should pay A 25");
+
+    let c_to_a = result
+        .get_final_result_item("C".into(), "A".into())
+        .expect("Item C to A should be exist");
+    assert_eq!(c_to_a, 25.0, "C should pay A 25");
+
+    let final_result = result.get_final_result();
+    assert_eq!(final_result.len(), 2, "Should have exactly 2 transactions");
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_unrelated_bills() {
+    let mut bills = Bills::default();
+
+    // A prepays 30 split among A, B, C, each should pay A 10
+    // B prepays 30 split among A, B, each should pay B 15
+    // Final result: C only has transaction with A, not with B
+    bills.add_bill("A", "Lunch", 30., vec!["A", "B", "C"]);
+    bills.add_bill("B", "Coffee", 30., vec!["A", "B"]);
+
+    let result = calculate_from(bills);
+    assert!(result.is_ok(), "calculate should be success");
+    let result = result.unwrap();
+
+    // Verify C only has transaction with A, not with B
+    let c_to_a = result.get_final_result_item("C".into(), "A".into());
+    assert!(c_to_a.is_some(), "C should pay A");
+    assert_eq!(c_to_a.unwrap(), 10.0, "C should pay A 10");
+
+    let c_to_b = result.get_final_result_item("C".into(), "B".into());
+    assert!(c_to_b.is_none(), "C should not have any transaction with B");
+
+    // Verify transaction between A and B
+    let a_to_b = result.get_final_result_item("A".into(), "B".into());
+    assert!(a_to_b.is_some(), "A should pay B");
+    assert_eq!(a_to_b.unwrap(), 5.0, "A should pay B 5 (15 - 10)");
+
+    // Verify total transaction count
+    let final_result = result.get_final_result();
+    assert_eq!(final_result.len(), 2, "Should have exactly 2 transactions");
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_duplicate_split_members() {
+    let mut bills = Bills::default();
+
+    // Duplicate members in split list, should return Error
+    bills.add_bill("Alice", "Lunch", 60., vec!["Bob", "Bob", "Charlie"]);
+
+    let result = calculate_from(bills);
+    assert!(
+        result.is_err(),
+        "Should return error for duplicate split members"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_negative_paid_amount() {
+    let mut bills = Bills::default();
+
+    // Negative prepaid amount, should return Error
+    bills.add_bill("Alice", "Refund?", -30., vec!["Alice", "Bob"]);
+
+    let result = calculate_from(bills);
+    assert!(
+        result.is_err(),
+        "Should return error for negative paid amount"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_rounding() {
+    let mut bills = Bills::default();
+
+    // Test rounding: 51.0333333333 => 51.00, 51.599999999999 => 52.00
+    // 100 / 3 = 33.333..., each should pay 33.33, payer gets back 66.67
+    bills.add_bill("Alice", "Concert", 100., vec!["Alice", "Bob", "Charlie"]);
+
+    let result = calculate_from(bills);
+    assert!(result.is_ok(), "calculate should be success");
+    let result = result.unwrap();
+
+    let bob_to_alice = result
+        .get_final_result_item("Bob".into(), "Alice".into())
+        .expect("Item Bob to Alice should be exist");
+    // 33.333... rounded to 2 decimal places => 33.33
+    assert_eq!(bob_to_alice, 33.33, "Bob should pay Alice 33.33");
+
+    let charlie_to_alice = result
+        .get_final_result_item("Charlie".into(), "Alice".into())
+        .expect("Item Charlie to Alice should be exist");
+    assert_eq!(charlie_to_alice, 33.33, "Charlie should pay Alice 33.33");
+
+    // Another test: 51.599999999999 => 52.00
+    let mut bills2 = Bills::default();
+    bills2.add_bill("Bob", "Dinner", 51.6, vec!["Alice", "Bob"]); // 51.6 / 2 = 25.8
+
+    let result2 = calculate_from(bills2);
+    assert!(result2.is_ok(), "calculate should be success");
+    let result2 = result2.unwrap();
+
+    let alice_to_bob = result2
+        .get_final_result_item("Alice".into(), "Bob".into())
+        .expect("Item Alice to Bob should be exist");
+    // 25.8 rounded to 2 decimal places => 25.80
+    assert_eq!(alice_to_bob, 25.8, "Alice should pay Bob 25.8");
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_empty_bills() {
+    let bills = Bills::default();
+    let result = calculate_from(bills);
+    assert!(
+        result.is_ok(),
+        "calculate should be success for empty bills"
+    );
+    let result = result.unwrap();
+
+    assert_eq!(
+        result.get_all_bills().len(),
+        0,
+        "Items should be empty for empty bills"
+    );
+    assert_eq!(
+        result.get_final_result().len(),
+        0,
+        "Final result should be empty for empty bills"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_single_person_bill() {
+    let mut bills = Bills::default();
+
+    // Single person bill: paying for oneself
+    bills.add_bill("Alice", "Personal", 50., vec!["Alice"]);
+
+    let result = calculate_from(bills);
+    assert!(
+        result.is_ok(),
+        "calculate should be success for single person bill"
+    );
+    let result = result.unwrap();
+
+    // Single person bill should not generate any transactions
+    assert_eq!(
+        result.get_final_result().len(),
+        0,
+        "Should have no transactions for single person bill"
+    );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_split_not_include_payer() {
+    let mut bills = Bills::default();
+
+    // Payer not included in split list
+    bills.add_bill("Alice", "Gift", 100., vec!["Bob", "Charlie"]);
+
+    let result = calculate_from(bills);
+    assert!(
+        result.is_ok(),
+        "calculate should be success when payer not in split"
+    );
+    let result = result.unwrap();
+
+    // Bob and Charlie should each pay Alice 50
+    let bob_to_alice = result
+        .get_final_result_item("Bob".into(), "Alice".into())
+        .expect("Bob should pay Alice");
+    assert_eq!(bob_to_alice, 50.0, "Bob should pay Alice 50");
+
+    let charlie_to_alice = result
+        .get_final_result_item("Charlie".into(), "Alice".into())
+        .expect("Charlie should pay Alice");
+    assert_eq!(charlie_to_alice, 50.0, "Charlie should pay Alice 50");
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_large_number_of_people() {
+    let mut bills = Bills::default();
+
+    // Test large group scenario
+    let people = vec!["A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H", "I", "J"];
+    bills.add_bill("A", "Group Dinner", 1000., people.clone());
+
+    let result = calculate_from(bills);
+    assert!(
+        result.is_ok(),
+        "calculate should be success for large group"
+    );
+    let result = result.unwrap();
+
+    // Each person should pay A 100 (1000/10)
+    for person in &people {
+        if *person != "A" {
+            let amount = result
+                .get_final_result_item(person.to_string().into(), "A".into())
+                .expect(&format!("{} should pay A", person));
+            assert_eq!(amount, 100.0, "{} should pay A 100", person);
+        }
+    }
+
+    assert_eq!(
+        result.get_final_result().len(),
+        9,
+        "Should have 9 transactions"
+    );
+}